sentiments of antisemitism - racism
is a form of racism; the expression of it manifests
itself many forms including the various expressions of
hatred against Jews and "entire Jewish communities".
1 The inbuilt Mac dictionary includes results from the
Thesaurus and the Wikipedia.
is a ubiquitous source of information and is edited by
"ordinary" and "reasonable" readers.
is accessible to anyone and everyone with an internet
connection. THE PAGES I AM BEING SUED OVER are, like
the Wikipedia, only accessible via a computer with an
internet connection. As such, the "ordinary" or
"reasonable" reader has access to not only what I
write, but to the Wikipedia as well. Any "reasonable"
or "ordinary" reader who has access to my pages also
has access to online dictionaries. That a reader, who
has these resources available to them, would instead
deliberately misread what is written, belies that this
reader has an ulterior intention by their misreading
what is written. Such a reader who seeks to
deliberately misread other meanings into what I have
written is simply doing this so that they might profit
from this deliberate action. It is patently malicious
= hatred of Jews
expressed a hostility or prejudice against Jews, and
that Jews are responsible for harms committed against
them by others simply because they are Jews.
a form of racism
hostility to Jews is racist (& he admitted to this
acknowledged his hostility towards Jews was racist -
obviously for him this was a justified racism of an
manifested in "expressions" of such hate
of such hate was made by Hitler, and this hate is
manifested by the left, and by people like Cripps who
is a manifestation of the left:
of such racism are multiform
of racism against Jews take the form of "academic"
racism, "Arab" racism, "Boycotts", "Christian" racism,
"Gaza War", "Islamic" racism, "Holocaust denial".
Another manifestation of hatred of Jews is Hitler's Mein
Kampf. It is not as if the word
"manifestation" can be confused to mean "something
else". Apparently my use of the word "manifestation"
means "adopted the failed theories".
Jews IS RACIST - Cripps blamed Jews:
Hitler expressed such sentiments - hatred toward Jews
- in Mein Kampf.
Hitler blamed Jews for cultural decay, "moral"
corruption, for economic problems. Hitler blamed Jews
for war (including blaming Jews for the
Franco-Prussian War, WW1, and the "forthcoming" war,
Hitler blamed Jews for conflict, and that the Nazis
blamed Jews for conflict (and world ills) is
"universally" known. So "universal" is this knowledge
that a USA school teacher was suspended for asking
students to write an essay using arguments from Nazi
propaganda which blamed Jews as "the source of our
the New York Times,
12 April 2013:
students were instructed to imagine that their teacher
was a Nazi and to construct an argument that Jews were
'the source of our problems' using historical
propaganda and, of course, a traditional high
school essay structure.
'Your essay must be five paragraphs long, with an
introduction, three body paragraphs containing your
strongest arguments, and a conclusion,' the assignment
read. 'You do not have a choice in your position: you
must argue that Jews are evil, and use solid
rationale from government propaganda to convince
me of your loyalty to the Third Reich!'”
the assignment, the teacher asked students to research
Nazi propaganda, then write a letter trying to
convince an official of the Third Reich 'that Jews are
evil and the source of our problems.'"
2 The Nazis blamed Jews for "problems" including war.
Knowledge of this is "universal". In commenting on my
painting Attempting the Destruction of the
Secular Muse, Robert Cripps objected to what I
had written claiming that Jews were responsible.
and the Nazis blamed Jews for conflict. Astonishingly,
this is a claim still made today in Australia.
publishers make the same accusation against Jews that
were made by Hitler (in his speeches and in Mein
Kampf), claims that were made by the Nazis,
and also made in the
Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion.
publishers claim that conflict (WAR) is a reaction by
others to what Jews do!! On
18/6/2009 & 24/6/2009 Cripps said that the
violence Muslims commit is a reaction to Jews!
was racist for Cripps to make this claim and it is
racist for the publishers, Cambridge University Press,
to do so too:
3 Australian publishers blame "much world conflict" on
the reaction by various peoples to Jews!
p. 25 of Humanist Transhumanist I write:
muse is in the middle of a bomb–cratered landscape.
The figure attached to mechanical devices is
assailed by war. The war is that of religion against
a secular society. The religion that assails secular
society today is Islam." (highlighted
4 Pp. 24-25 of Humanist Transhumanist.
Cripps objected to the quotes from the Koran with
regards to what I have written above. Cripps claimed
that this was "too complex" for him to understand.
was ignorant of the Koran and ignorant of history, and
the quotes conflicted with his racism (prejudice
against Jews). Cripps sought to protect his
sentiments, being his hatred of Jews, so that he could
continue to hate Jews. He did this by calling me
"racist" back in 2009, and continues to protect this
idea from criticism by suing me to protect it now.
quotes from the Koran urge Muslims to kill and to die
in the process of killing others; that doing so leads
to instant Martyrdom; and that the objective of
Muslims is to convert all of us to Islam, or reduce us
to "paying tribute out of hand". These quotes were in
conflict with Cripps' SENTIMENTS, because they showed
that Muslims advocate war against non-Muslims
which includes Jews which means it is likely
that "Jewish" actions against Muslims "in Palestine"
are a reaction to Islamic violence and not Jewish
believed that any audience exposed to these quotes
would come to blame Muslims for violence in Palestine
instead of Jews. Cripps claimed violence was caused by
Jews, and claimed that quotes from the Koran were
"opinion", and that this "opinion" was racist.
Palestine, to reiterate, was not mentioned or relevant
to any part of our exhibition.
political left consistently label critics of Islam
racist, equate criticism of Islam with "pro-Israel",
and advocate for "Palestine".
declaration that quoting the Koran is racist is de
rigueur leftism and is the subject of this blog: http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/07/green-councillor-candidate-assaults.html
recently the equating of criticism of Islam with being
racist was leveled against the atheist biologist
calling critics of Islam "racist", the political left
also support Islamic
Houghton: ignorant of history?
introduced the idiotic
claim that what I wrote meant that Cripps was a
"dangerous racist" and that he had "adopted the failed
theories of the National Socialists" simply because I
wrote of the historical fact that the sentiments
adopted by the Left against Jews were sentiments
that had already been expressed by
Hitler in Mein Kampf.
Robert Cripps is a self-confessed racist.
2) Robert Cripps is:
manifestation of the new-left who have adopted the
sentiments Hitler expressed in his Mein Kampf, but who
believe that, though theirs and Hitler's sentiments
are the same, their racism is a 'justifiable' one"
apparently still have to defend myself against this idiotic
claim in court.
if one is ignorant of history (as I must conclude
Houghton is) then the stating of an historical fact
makes stating that fact an OUTRAGE!
Hitler had stated his sentiments on Jews in Mein
Kampf, as a matter of history, is OUTRAGEOUS!
those sentiments, expressed by Hitler (as a matter of
history in Mein
Kampf), are sentiments adopted by the
political Left, is OUTRAGEOUS!
Cripps is a manifestation of the Left, simply another
Milgram experiment: "conducted
by Yale University psychologist Stanley
Milgram... measured the willingness of study
participants to obey an authority figure who
instructed them to perform acts that
conflicted with their personal conscience."
the Nazis became the government of Germany,
universities had made hatred of Jews respectable. This
is the subject of my blog http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/university-student-unions-then-and-now.html
"expressed" that hatred of Jews, being his
Mein Kampf. Again, this is the subject of my
history is being re-visioned, (fig. 5). Re-visioning
Hitler intends to make what occurred in Germany an
invention of the Nazis and of Hitler. And for Cripps
and his crack legal team this revisionism aids in
claiming how great an OUTRAGE it is that has been
suffered by Cripps. The revisionism that has been
occurring regarding this particular period of history
is very well known (fig. 5):
5 The manifestations of antisemitic sentiments.
used to write about historic revisionism regarding
above example (fig. 5) of one page from an article on
the historic revisionism even uses the same words that
I use, words such as "manifestation" and "sentiment",
words whose meaning I have to prove in court because
their meaning when I use these words is different from
the meanings these words have when used by others, or
how these words are understood by others.
above page (fig. 5) writing on the historic
revisionism that seeks to blame Hitler and the Nazis
for the rise of German racism is from a Holocaust
Memorial website (fig. 6):
6 Holocaust memorial site that discusses the
historical revisionism that has sought to eliminate
the manifestations of Germany's pre-existing racist
sentiments regarding Jews.
revisionism has amounted to an attempt to re-define
"antisemitism" in such a way that it is now being
claimed to be a Nazi phenomenon or invention. That
is, the historical account is being re-written to
make the following claim: that without the Nazis
"antisemitism" would never have happened. And,
"antisemitism" is claimed to have been introduced by
the Nazis as if the Nazis, specifically Adolf
Hitler, invented it, and that it first appeared in
Therefore to write about adopting the sentiments
expressed by Hitler in Mein Kampf, can be made to
mean, according to such an historical revisionism,
something that it cannot possibly mean: that being
that, since Hitler invented these sentiments, by
writing such a thing can be said to mean adopting
the theories advocated by Adolf Hitler. Nothing is
further from the truth.
Accepting this revisionism in which pre-Nazi German
antisemitism has been erased, makes it mean that the
sentiments of "antisemitism" expressed by Hitler
(sentiments which were not Hitler's creation, as
these were the sentiments of antisemitism of
Germany) that were expressed by Hitler in Mein
Kampf, are Hitler's own personal sentiments even
though this is historically false - Hitler never had
a hand in creating them.
7d, al Husseini, a Muslim Nazi greets Bosniacs.
From the Bundesarchiv. Al Husseini is the subject
Crack legal team,
Dibb, the "notoriously short-winded" joker in the pack. Cripps is hoping that Dibb's fedora really does have a rabbit in it. Dibb is a self-proclaimed champion for the victims of "cyberbullying". Dibb however supports other types of bullying such as unconscionable conduct undertaken by the clients he represents, such as Cripps.
8 screenshot of
as it appeared on 24 June 2013 (it has since
gone). Dibb specialises in defamation law and
advocates against "cyberbullying". He claims to
be currently representing clients who are "being
harassed in ways that are very distressing".
Cripps is one such client represented by Dibb,
and we are being sued for writing
("cyber-writing"?) about what his client did to
us and to others on the internet.
[OIC AND "DEFAMATION" OF RELIGION]
The concept of "Defamation of Religion", so
vigorously supported by Australia's Human Rights
watch-dog, was rejected in 2011 by the "Office
of the High Commissioner for Human Rights" in
Geneva because it it was antithetic and in
contradiction to Human Rights.
48 ABOUT "defamation of religion" from
"Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights" in Geneva:
"48. Prohibitions of displays of lack of respect
for a religion or other belief system, including
blasphemy laws, are incompatible with the
Covenant, except in the specific circumstances
envisaged in article 20, paragraph 2, of the
Covenant. Such prohibitions must also comply
with the strict requirements of article 19,
paragraph 3, as well as such articles as 2, 5,
17, 18 and 26. Thus, for instance, it would be
impermissible for any such laws to discriminate
in favour of or against one or certain religions
or belief systems, or their adherents over
another, or religious believers over
non-believers. Nor would it be permissible for
such prohibitions to be used to prevent or
punish criticism of religious leaders or
commentary on religious doctrine and tenets of
(further information can be found on
of religion and the United Nations -
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This idea was initiated by Pakistan on behalf of
the OIC (Organisation
of Islamic Cooperation)Organisation of Islamic
Cooperation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Islamic Human Rights" are sought for by bodies such as the OIC. One such "right" is the enforcement of Sharia. For the OIC any country in which Sharia is not practiced is of itself a denial of Human Rights to Muslims living in that country. The concept of "Muslim human rights" is known as the Cairo
Declaration (on Human Rights in Islam).
Declaration is a declaration in which
human rights are superseded by rights Muslims have
over non-Muslims and in which the goals of these
"rights" is to allow Muslims to pursue religious
obligations unencumbered by the rights of others
- rights such as, one supposes, a Muslim's "
right" to seek the genocide of the Jews http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/genocide-incited-by-australian-muslims.html.
The OIC is renown for the racism which it
manifests in the form of people such
as Malaysia's Mahatir.
9 screenshot of the Muslim concept of Human
Rights. There is no freedom of religion, and
everyone is bound by religious laws and
to fig.1: One of the multiform MANIFESTATIONS of
the racism against Jews is Islam (which seeks
the genocide of the Jews in the hadith, where
the hadith constitute Sunna, whose legal
enforcement is Sharia).
Cripps, far left, who ran the failed GLG,
realised and accepted he was racist to hate
Jews ("self-confessed racist" means just
that). He preferred to call me "racist" in my
critique of Islamic doctrine (the Koran)
because he preferred to blame "the Jews and
their state in Palestine" for a conflict that
was not mentioned in my criticism of
religions. Supporters of the "Palestinian
cause" call "racist" any critic of Islam - as
they did recently in Melbourne, Australia,
when they organised pro-"Palestine" protests
against a critic of Islamic doctrine.
Demetrios Vakras 14 December 2013
Edited 16/12/2013 at 9:35 AM to correct typos, "for" replaces "ofr"; [---]; Dibb is now a "champion for the 'victims' of 'cyberbullying'", instead of "champion against 'cyberbullying'"; and the HREOC "recommended" using, instead of "cited using" the particular criminal code against people it describes as "cyber-racists".
EDITED 8/8/2015 TO REMOVE CONTENT.
are petitioning the Australian government to
amend the Defamation Act of 2005 to make
Australian law consistent with its international
Support our petition here:http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/the-hon-mark-dreyfus-qc-mp-amend-the-australian-defamation-act-2005